At the British Library, a 40 minute task to read, summarise and model narrative techniques in a single book was given to everyone.
I selected an old favourite: The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, and in particular a chapter titled 'The mystery of the red-headed league'.
I made notes digitally at the time instead of in my sketchbook as it was faster, and this is what i wrote:
'decided to choose 'the adventures of sherlock holmes', in particular my favourite story 'the mystery of the read headed league'.
Dr watson is used as a framing device for the stories, and it usually opens with him setting the timeframe. The story usually opening in baker street, bringing in the character with the problem, sherlock holmes doing some cold reading on the visitor kind of like a parlour trick, and then explaining how he did it.
A large part of what draws you in is being behind what sherlock holmes knows, and feeling as if you're playing catch up.
The story describes a complex ruse that is used to get someone out of the wayto commit a crime. A monetary bribe is used. The victim is a shopkeeper, who is confused (and doesnt know that he is being used), because he had a lucrative job writing out the english dictionary daily at the red headed league. His only qualification for getting the job was being a redhead.
What he didnt understand was that the league didnt exist, and whilst he was out, his shop was being used (by his assistant) to tunnel into a bank to steal millions in gold bars.
I suppose you could do a literal representation of playing catchup, like having something in the model that moves that you cant catch, or an idea (written or pictured) that you can only see half of, or something that is half buried that takes a long time to get out.'
On page 1&2 of my sketchbook, i added to this model ideation by adding that there is something in the model that you cant find, or that you are given clues to by interacting with other parts of the model. I also thought to add that the model could show something that you have to pull out to expose.

Whilst i was reflecting on my identification of Dr. Watson as a framing device, i made some new observations.
1. That the narrative moves from reflecting in the past to present time periodically in order to ceate suspense, and a sense of us being in the dark.
2. That sherlock holmes is also a step ahead of Dr. Watson himself, which in a way normalises our ignorance, and doesn't make us feel stupid.
How to invoke each of these parts?
TYPE A. literal representations
TYPE B. metaphors

I created a flow-chart of the narrative, and made some examples of modelling techniques based on the two types that i identified previously.
This lead me on to thinking of different ways of splitting up a book, and categorising it, as you have to split something before you can put it back together. There are so many dofferent ways of doing it, and brainstorming this would not only help me look at different ways to organise the text, but possibly also inspire me to find different ways of modelling them.
I also am going to research different narrative techniques and story types.